– Aforementioned matter for discussion and consideration also to resolve difficulties, issues and problems all of US go through when access to benefits such as private insurance coverage is required and when in EU, in particular when a insurance policy is with a EU insurance company regulated by EU regulators for ” Credit Management and Financial Institutions Industry ” , and insurance company supplying policies and a coverage for health related matter, medical expenses and for sanitary services in private clinics or hospitals.
In connection with NHS project then, appointed by british MP’s groups in brussels, to consulting companies and organizations, to technical advisors/experts and with legal supervision of the one law firm also a multinational organization and with subsidiaries also registered in all three ” Benelux ” territories, british members of the parliament groups in brussels however, consulting companies / advisors and multinational law firm, for the monitoring and surveillance of industries operations to adhere with directives approved by head-office and administration directors for national sanitary services, and industry directives however compliant/conforming to government laws and regulations. ( Industries operations also incl. however with no limitations to the public sector’s, pharmaceutical industries’ and national sanitary services’ across 28 members states )
– immediate attention is then required by lawmakers across all EU members states and by EU parliament in Brussels, for changing laws and regulation and to make benefit for private insurance coverage availability, as straight-forward as it can be, in a similar way this happens already in USA and where, handling a credit card to a desk clerk in a hospital and a credit card by which we pay insurance policy premium, with coverage for medical expenses, and a policy that can be traced on the system by credit card details. [ TODAY in EU we still have national sanitary service, A&E, General Practices, hereinafter GP doctor or specialist, releasing a response and a diagnosis before getting US referred for activating the insurance coverage for private health system/service ]
Also requiring immediate attention, evidence of lack of training and education for administrative staff members working @ GP’s and to acknowledge inspections on how admin employees and workers react when placed under pressure, inspections and surveys on how employees and workers handle stress and frustrations over working hours and administrative staff members @ GP in addition, resistant and reluctant to learning and understanding MUST-HAVE for second opinions and then further consultation, when common and essential prerequisites aren’t met or in place for handling trust and establishing trust relationship. Admin staff also unaware of standard procedures and routine to have diagnosis and prognosis confirmed by a second opinion under certain circumstances. Administrative staff members also showing being unaware of a more appropriate A&E department available at most hospitals and for emergencies and urgent matter relating to health/sanitary issues.
In addition to the aforementioned problems and issues please note:
- A&E departments in hospitals are introducing nurses pretending to be doctors and releasing prescriptions for medications, recognized and standard chemist would not supply;
- Anomalies with doctors allocations @ a General Practice ;
- Breach of hippocratic oath and of legal terms for performing a role of a doctor, ( professional association/doctors societies ban is then required ) and breach in connection with data and information on health status and medication prescriptions for a patient, MUST be kept ” private and confidential ” between a doctor and a patient;
- Flaws with GP introducing nurses in place of doctors.
NOTE: THERE ARE NO DOCTORS WE KNOW OF, TAKING THE RISK OF JOINING A PRACTICE BASED ON CONDITIONS AND TERMS THE BELOW MENTIONED GENERAL PRACTICE SUGGESTS AND FOLLOWS, AND FOR DOCTORS ALWAYS DO AVOID TAKING A RISK OF BEING BANNED FROM PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION/DOCTORS SOCIETIES
NOTE: MORE ON INSURANCE COMPANIES, COVERAGE AND POLICIES IN A SEPARATE POST, AND IN CONNECTION WITH INDUSTRY SECTORS INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PAYMENT WILL ALWAYS BE DENIED FOR INDUSTRY SECTORS, FAILING TO ABIDE BY CURRENT AND RECENT LAWS AND REGULATIONS ( http://wp.me/p11Wmh-ev )EXAMPLE : ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY SECTOR AND SOON GYM AND FITNESS CLUBS FOLLOWING SIMILAR TREND AND IN BREACH OF LEGAL TERMS
On 2015-04-17, at 9:11 PM,
A – dr. Baumgarten comes across with a rather so called attitude, and with very rude behavior and mannerism ( i.e: ” we can’t be arsed “ handling trust and won‘t establish trust relationship with Er. Baumgarten. No confidential data or information are to be released to Er. Baumgarten or whoever introduced himself as dr. Baumgarten. In fact a form of ID, passport or any proof of ID wasn’t asked however, doubts have currently been raised for the person meeting US on Tuesday, whatever his name is, may or may not be a doctor. )
In relation to confidentiality, it is rather different matter and distant from data protection act, privacy and sensitive data; Data, Discussions, Consultation and conversations, Information in relation to health status of a patient or medication, are to be kept confidential and between doctor and patient only. ( Same rules apply when meeting with lawyer, solicitor or a priest for confession however, also stated by law makers )
B – in connection with practice registration all details are clear, what comes across rather odd is Your staff denied allocating a doctor. ( i.e: A allocated GP doctor can be seen after scheduling an appointment and for urgent matter or emergencies, A&E departments are available at most hospitals; A dr. available to taking over the work of allocated GP doctor can be seen when scheduling appointments, and when allocated GP doctor is not available for holiday, illness or away for up to date training. ) Urgent health matter with a dr. who is almost unknown, IS OUT OF CONVERSATION.
C – your messaging system is rather odd, and that is the reason why email address was used for the first message whereas Daniel Steel uses the website form. Daniel Steel is a insurer/insurance company dr, and also legal advisor or expert, following this matter and trying to understand why the practice made decisions to take initiatives far from NHS directives conforming to laws and regulations. [technical details of the messaging system problems, won‘t be released on this occasion although they come across rather bizarre, it is however matter pertaining discussion and consideration with engineering and technical department ]
From: Neville Sue (NHS CITY AND HACKNEY CCG)
Sent: 17 April 2015 15:43
Cc: Beresford Diane (NHS CITY AND HACKNEY CCG)
Subject: re letter
This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the
sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents:
to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Thank you for your co-operation.
NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland
NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients
NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere
On 2015-04-15, at 10:03 PM,
dear Sue Neville,
thanks’ for helping US with GP ( general practice ) registration back on monday this week, after reading your practice leaflet and the INFO printed on the leaflet, we made decision to contact the practice and the manager once more, for irregular and unusual procedures currently in place at Your practice. ( in conflict with gov. and NHS administration directives )After seeing both Dr. Baumgarten and Dr. Molyneux scheduling appointments on two different days, i’d like to report back ( feedback ) around a few little things coming across rather odd things.i was introduced to a doctor with a rather so called attitude, and with very rude behavior and mannerism when dealing with patients, raising matter for discussion and consideration he may or may not be real and authentic doctor, in fact he may not be suitable doctor for England. ( graduating in germany can be a weakness when graduating in the then eastern germany, DDR ).
we have met instead with Dr. Molyneux who sounds a lot more straight forward however, confirming a diagnosis of A&E equivalent service at the Hospital in South London, and a diagnosis apparently not quite correct. ( i.e: according to physiotherapy team at my club who also may qualify as experts on the matter )
we also met with the one receptionist with long dark hair, who was unable to allocate a dr. in the practice and stating the practice doesn’t follow gov. and NHS directives and therefore, we will always see a different doctor according to who is available on the day. [ that is supposed to only happen when the allocated dr. is on holiday or not avail for reasons in connection with sick days or with up to date training ]
what worries US the most however, is confidentiality between a doctor and his/her patients that no longer occurs for information may then be shared across the practice doctors, and becoming unusual and quite unsafe for patients too. In addition to lack of trust and missing trust relationship between Dr. and a patient that no longer occurs, for obvious reasons.
i have now discussed the matter with doctors living in the very same building where my girlfriend lives, and also discussed the very same matter with doctors working in the administration department at the hospital i have the pleasure to work with, and confirming what i am reporting above is not a orthodox procedure and for we may incur in seeing doctors who do not belong to the practice, turning up for the appointment pretending to be someone else ( impersonating a doctor ) and with intentions to harm our health with prescriptions and medications we are not supposed to be left with.